PM: A Year in Review
PM in hybrid work is no longer a copy and paste of what it was pre-pandemic.1 To get a grasp on what organizations are doing (or not doing) for PM, we looked at more than 60 academic and business articles and reports around PM for this literature review. This article summarizes:
- 4 major themes
- Hidden gems we found among the lit reviewed
- 5 critical articles that caught our attention
- 5 additional articles to check out if you have time
The pandemic has changed how people work. However, PM practices haven’t kept pace. The specific themes that emerged from the literature are as follows:
- Hybrid PM requires orgs to rethink culture and bias
- Managers need to tackle PM with empathy
- PM tech can play a crucial role in helping teams perform
- Orgs are approaching PM with an assortment of strategies
The following sections take a closer look at these 4 themes.
Hybrid PM requires orgs to rethink culture & bias
Leaders are worried about a lot of things in hybrid work—and culture is one of them.2 We found many articles explaining how matching an org’s in-office culture to a hybrid work environment doesn’t work: This includes PM discussions. Orgs that are aware of this have implemented frequent performance feedback discussions3 since the start of the pandemic. They’ve also matched feedback conversations to the comfort and needs of the employees.4
Historically, PM has favored people in the office more than remote workers due to proximity bias.5While this bias may have been reduced when most people worked remotely, as employers bring people back to the office, the potential for this bias to resurface increases. If, as some expect,6 majority populations return to the office for more days per week than women or underrepresented minorities, it’s likely those majority populations will reap the benefits of proximity bias. Orgs need to proactively design for and address this situation.
In addition, during the pandemic, a concept known as “the intensive margin” has become more popular: It describes caregivers who are holding the same roles—but working fewer hours, declining assignments, or deciding against a promotion or new job due to childcare demands. Several articles highlight the gap in how rewards and opportunities for groups who’ve been experiencing the intensive margin is likely to have longer-lasting effects than the pandemic itself.7 This is again something orgs have to address as they look to retain the upward mobility of women and underrepresented populations (who are more likely to experience “the intensive margin”).
Managers need to tackle PM with empathy
As we rub our eyes and try to emerge from the pandemic, one thing is certain: We’re burned out. As Adam Grant described it,
People are languishing.8
Managers are shapeshifting into empathetic supporters and burnout alert buttons for their teams, while feeling everything but prepared for that new role.9 The resurgence of empathy as a management competency is due to the blurring lines between personal and work lives. The hardships brought on by the pandemic and social injustices have forced more personal conversations: Managers have had to be examples of vulnerability, while also creating psychologically safe environments.10
PM tech can play a crucial role in helping hybrid teams perform
Withstanding the turbulence since March 2020 has meant teams needed to reform in different locations, persisting through hardships, normalizing ambiguity, and striving to perform. To enable teams in these more digital environments, orgs have:
- Positioned PM tech to support the definition and measurement of employee performance11
- Leveraged PM tech to give power to employees to create their own goals12
With a ton of PM tech out there, orgs should be mindful of issues such as whether the tech is removing bias, and providing further clarity and power to workers. Employee tracking doesn’t necessarily equal more productivity.13 The asynchronous nature of hybrid work highlights the “how” work gets done as being less important than the “what” gets accomplished.
Orgs are approaching PM with an assortment of strategies
It’s a mixed bag when it comes to what orgs have been doing with PM during the pandemic as reflected in Figure 1 below:14
- Redefined high-performance competencies15
- Focused more on behaviors than outcomes
- Adopted new or enhanced PM platforms during the pandemic16
Some orgs kept the ratings for the very highest and very lowest performers, but focused less on the ratings for those in the middle of the pack. Those with high ratings have been recognized for motivation and retention purposes. Managers have had development conversations with lower performers whose lagging was seen as less to do with an employee’s abilities 17 and more with the circumstances surrounding them.
In terms of employee-directed goals, it’s been common to see employees creating their own PM processes,18 while multi-rater assessments have become the popular new kids on the block19 — especially for companies with self-managed work teams for which there’s no formal boss.
Among the lit we reviewed, we found the following 3 hidden gems to share with you:
1. Recognition and rewards matter in hybrid work.
An employee’s desire to be recognized and rewarded increases in times of disruption, such as the pandemic. We came across evidence that extrinsic motivators are more important in hybrid work,20 and can positively impact morale and retention.
2. PM tracking needs to meet the ethical needs of hybrid work.
Performance tracking platforms have increased in popularity since the start of hybrid work. We came across a few intriguing pieces that highlight the importance of ethics and the risks of these integrated platforms.
When it comes to performance tracking, orgs must be careful not to erode employee trust, morale, or wellbeing. Strategies for this include enforcement of rules and regulations for which employees can remain in the driver’s seat and authorize use of their data.21 Tech that monitors employee performance can easily move into manipulation and “Big Brother” oversight, and should be closely monitored.
3. Where’s HR in all of this?
HR teams are becoming increasingly removed from monitoring performance and team dynamics—something HR had already been struggling with, but was exacerbated by the pandemic. Through the democratization of PM processes like peer feedback and employee-created goals, HR is taking a seat at the strategy table for PM (instead of the administration table) where they are serving as consultants who tie PM value to business needs.22
In hybrid work, managers are the PM pilots of their teams and HR is air traffic control—ready to support when needed, maintaining accountability to cultural values, and clearing the runway of obstacles.
What Caught Our Attention
Of the literature we reviewed, 5 critical articles stood out to us. We learned from their perspectives and hope you can as well.
Brian Kropp, Alexia Cambon & Sara Clark
This article describes a new era of management in which effective managers of the future will be those who focus and build relationships around how employees feel (via empathy) and manage visibility on what they’re doing.
"When interactions become primarily virtual, managers can no longer rely on what they see to manage performance, and when relationships become more emotional, they can no longer limit the relationship to the sphere of work."
- Reports higher levels of performance and inclusion as an outcome of empathy-based management
- Emphasizes the development of internal manager support groups to provide a safe space in which to practice empathy
- Affirms that reorganization of teams increases a manager's capacity and time to have intentional conversations with employees
- States that capabilities of managers are evolving to require more complex (emotion-based) competencies for which trust and fairness are integral
With hybrid work, this article argues that performance data and analytics are the nonnegotiable nutrients that give strength to the relationship happening between an employee and the org, while providing visible insights into the org’s limitations and strengths.
"High-performance management depends on high-performance measurement. The digital future of one depends on the digital future of the other."
- Describes how COVID-induced remote work really exposes orgs and leaders to what little insights they have on their employees
- Argues that real-time performance and people analytics are indicators which can assist in PM decisions that are accurate, transparent, and fair
- Offers strategies to position PM dashboards as insight providers that are prescriptive and descriptive
- Acknowledges that digital accountability platforms must reflect the coexistence of blurred work and home lives to ensure validity and remove bias in measurements
Herman Aguinis & Jing Burgi-Tian
This journal article suggests that the scattered features of PM's potential are best when brought together in a strategic, relevant, and intentional way.
" … Implementing evidence-based performance management practices can not only help address pandemic-related talent management challenges but also allow organizations to thrive after the pandemic is over."
- Defines performance management as future-driven, ongoing, and aligned with org goals
- Describes how evidence-based PM can be a life raft for orgs to use during unprecedented transitions like the COVID-19 pandemic
- Maintains that PM, while evolving, still fulfills a strategic, developmental, and documentary need
- Recommends using evidence-based PM techniques, such as measuring results, in addition to behaviors, measuring adaptive performance, and using multi-rater processes
Alessandro Di Fiore & Marcio Souza
This article talks about the diversification of sources within performance feedback, in which peers help provide managers with a fuller view of their employee’s work and interactions.
"The opportunity to create a socially-based feedback system feels even more urgent during the COVID-19 crisis, since many people are working remotely and without the same level of daily interactions with managers."
- Provides an overview of socially focused feedback as part of the PM process
- States that peer feedback is intended to help capture performance and behavior among remote employees who are less visible to their managers
- Explains that aggregated feedback assists managers in focusing their development conversations
- Advises that crowdsourcing techniques for PM must consider who’s giving the feedback, what categories they’re assessing, when it’s given, and how (anonymous? weighted?)
Lori Nishiura Mackenzie, JoAnne Wehner & Sofia Kennedy
This article highlights the need for continuous awareness and accountability—both individually and on a team level—together with empathy and compassion to dismantle bias in hybrid work.
"Figuring out how to evaluate and reward employees fairly is hard even in the best of times. In this crisis, managers are facing a trifecta of conditions that make the task even harder because they’re likely to give rise to increased bias."
- Emphasizes that managers should use empathy when balancing rewarding high performers and coaching / developing lower performers
- Argues that, during times of crisis, managers are likely using their “fast-thinking” brains, which increases the chance of bias
- Explains that implicit preference for those working in-person is increasing PM bias in hybrid workplaces
- Recommends managers become crystal clear on evaluation criteria, combing for any unintended consequences, and “monitoring” other managers to ensure consistency and equity
Additional Articles to Check Out:
- “Technology Can Ease Hybrid Work’s Performance Management Woes," SHRM, D. Zielinski, 2021.
- “What Psychological Safety Looks Like in a Hybrid Workplace," Harvard Business Review, A. Edmondson & M. Mortensen, 2021.
- “How One Company Worked to Root Out Bias from Performance Reviews," Harvard Business Review, J.C. Williams et al., 2021.
- “How to Do Performance Reviews – Remotely," Harvard Business Review, R. Knight, 2020.
- “Trust Is Key For Performance Management When Working Remotely," Forbes.com, A. Gaskell, 2020.
Priyanka Mehrotra is a Research Lead at RedThread Research. Before joining the company in 2018, she was part of the research team at Bersin by Deloitte where she worked on talent management, D&I, and people analytics as well as conducted research and contributed content for Bersin’s Mid-market study. Prior to Bersin by Deloitte, Priyanka worked at several non-profits, think-tanks, and international organizations where she published and co-authored several articles.
- “Gartner HR Research Shows Organizations Are Eroding Employee Performance and Well-Being with Virtualized Office-Centric Design,”, Mary Baker & Teresa Zuech, Gartner, May 2021.
- “The Makings of Modern PM”, Dani Johnson & Stacia Garr, RedThread Research, October 2019.
- “Why Performance Data Will Make or Break the Hybrid Working Model“, Michael Cupps, LinkedIn, June 2021.
- “Performance Management Evolves“, Brian O’Connell, SHRM, June 2020.
- “Preventing Proximity Bias In Hybrid Work Is Key To Closing Equity Gaps”, Katica Roy, Linkedin, July 2021.
- “The Double-Double Shift”, Priyanka Mehrotra & Stacia Garr, RedThread Research, July 2020.
- “Pandemic Will ‘Take Our Women 10 Years Back’ in the Workplace“, Amanda Taub, The New York Times, July 2021.
- “What To Say To Your “Languishing” Employees Post-Covid-19“, Tess Brigham, Forbes, May 2021.
- “What Does It Mean to Be a Manager Today?”, Brian Kopp, Alexia Cambon & Sara Clark, Harvard Business Review, April 2021.
- “What Psychological Safety Looks Like in a Hybrid Workplace“, Amy Edmondson & Mark Mortensen, Harvard Business Review, April 2021.
- “Redefine Performance Management to Drive Impact – Smarter With Gartner“, Mary Baker, Gartner, November 2020.
- “People analytics, explained”, Tam Harbet, MIT Sloan Management School, May 2020.
- “Employees Are More Likely To Pretend They’re Working When Employers Track Their Productivity: Here’s Why”, Kristin Stoller, Forbes, May 2021.
- “The impact of COVID-19 on PM“, Arj Bagga, HR Director, July 2020.
- “Rethinking Performance Management for Post-Pandemic Success“, Michael Schrage, MIT Sloan Management Review, June 2020.
- “Technology Can Ease Hybrid Work’s Performance Management Woes“, Dave Zielinski, SHRM, June 2021.
- How to do Performance Reviews – Remotely”, Rebecca Knight, Harvard Business Review, June 2020.
- “Goodbye performance ratings, hello impact!”, Steven Baert, LinkedIn, March 2021.
- “Are Peer Reviews the Future of Performance Evaluations?”, Alessandro Di Fiore & Marcio Souza, Harvard Business Review, January 2021.
- “Changes in Motivation That Affect Employee Performance During the COVID-19 Pandemic“, B. Medina Nilasari, M. Nisfiannoor, & Florensia Rosary Meida Devinta, Journal of Applied Management, March 2021.
- “Tech is Transforming People Analytics. Is That a Good Thing?”, Tomas Chamorro-Premzic & Ian Bailie, Harvard Business Review, October 2020.
- “How will the HRBP role evolve post-pandemic?”, Jennifer Wich, HR Director, August 2021.